Socrates and Euthyphro Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 3

Socrates and Euthyphro - Essay ExampleWhen asked by Socrates what holiness is, Euthyphro answers, the holy is what I am doing now, persecuting murder and temple theft and everything of the sort, whether commence or mother or anyone else is guilty of it (pg.4, 8). The main mistake in this definition of holiness is that it the definition is shallow and does not include all what is referred to as holiness this is because there are many holy deeds that do not involve persecuting religious offenders. Socrates recognized this mistake and challenged Euthyphro to give a interrupt and a broader definition of holiness.Secondly, having realized the logical inconsistency of his first definition of holiness, Euthyphro attempted his second definition of holiness and he be holiness as what is approved by the gods Euthyphro says Then what is dear to the gods is holy, and what is not dear to them is unholy (pg.6, 5). The main weakness in this argument is that it assumes that gods agree on all thi ngs and that they do not disaccord on anything. Socrates noticed this logical mistake and asked Euthyphro on whether or not gods do not disagree at all. Euthphro agreed that gods disagree and actually even quarrel amongst themselves. Socrates, therefore, challenged Euthyphro to come up with a better definition of holiness.In an attempt to give a better definition of holiness, Euthyphro defined holiness as what is loved by all the gods, Euthphro defines holiness thus, the holy is what all the gods love, and that the opposite, what all the gods hate is unholy (pg.10. 3). The main logical mistake in this argument is that it does not explain the true nature of holiness, i.e. the definition does not explain what makes something holy. Socrates noticed this inconsistency and challenged Euthyphro to explain to him whether something is holy because it is approved by the gods, or it is because something is holy